Skip to main content

Weld repair-Analyze the failure before attempting the repair

When something breaks, you acknowledge the shock, scratch your head, take stock of the situation, and look for the fastest way to repair the item and put it back into operation. The pressure to repair quickly is understandable, but common sense suggests stopping for a moment and trying to understand what caused the break before attempting the repair.

By Elia Levi, Contributing Writer
When something breaks, you acknowledge the shock, scratch your head, take stock of the situation, and look for the fastest way to repair the item and put it back into operation. The pressure to repair quickly is understandable, but common sense suggests stopping for a moment and trying to understand what caused the break before attempting the repair.

Failure Analysis

Almost anything can fracture. The science investigating the origins of fractures is called failure analysis, and it is used to establish responsibilities for fractures and to determine preventive measures for avoiding future occurrences. An introductory, interesting book on this subject was written by Donald J. Wulpi and is titled Understanding How Components Fail. 1

Service Failures

This article discusses only in-service weldment breakage, also described as service failures. Weldments are assemblies with parts joined by welding. Failures occurring during or immediately following welding are easier to deal with, because all conditions are known.

So if the item was welded originally, it should be weldable again for repair, right?

Yes, but only if you know the materials and their conditions and whether they still are exactly as they were at fabrication time—no heat treatment or other surface conditioning has been introduced. You also must know the precise process and welding procedure that were used in the first place, which usually isn’t the case.

What Caused the Break?

Before attempting any repair, you must determine why the break occurred. If you restore the item exactly to its original condition, chances are another breakage will occur. (At that time it may well be none of your concern, but you must operate professionally at all times).

While a fully implemented professional investigation by an experienced metallurgist would be the best recourse, this usually is justifiable only in selected cases—for example, for presenting claims to the manufacturer or to the insurance company. It is mandatory, however, if injury to persons or property loss was or could have been involved.

Left to involved people, the human urge to clear oneself and to find fault in someone else’s actions or inactions can interfere with an investigation.

The main reasons that weldments fail are:

Inadequate material or properties.
Poor design.
Poor workmanship.
Excessive unanticipated service conditions.
The Investigation Process

Even if the person in charge is not specifically trained as a failure analyst, a few investigative steps should always be taken:

1.       First take care that nothing be moved, manipulated, reassembled, or fixed.

2.       Document the condition of the weldment when the breakage was found.

3.       Write down all that is known, and question all who were present.

4.       Note the ambient temperature at the time of occurrence.

5.       Take pictures, both general and close-ups.

6.       Protect the place from rain and other environmental disturbing factors

Firmly resist the pressing urge (your own and of those around you) to supply a theory for the breakage, especially before having assembled all the information.

A description of the weld profile as visible under low-power magnification should include such details as dimensions and fit-up as much as they can be determined visually. If possible, these details should be compared with design requirements.

When the structure operates normally at elevated temperature, it is probably under some code legislation that may request an official investigation.

A weld breakage usually is a crack or a fracture. Much information can be drawn from an exact description of the failure. A crack should be characterized by its dimensions, by its orientation (longitudinal, along the weld bead, or transversal), and by its position relative to the weld itself (on the weld bead or on its sides, in the heat-affected zone, or in the base metal).

If the fracture is open, do not reassemble the mating parts. Doing so can obliterate important clues. Inspect the fractured surfaces with a low-power lens or microscope that can show internal defects like gas holes or pores, nonmetallic inclusions, or indications of fatigue failure in the form of concentric beach marks.

The presence of macroscopic deformations and the fibrous or glassy aspect of the surfaces should be assessed to reveal if the failure was ductile (with deformation) or brittle (without deformation).

Specific colors on the surfaces should be remarked; they might be clues about local heating and oxidation. The extent of corrosion, if present, has to be determined and documented.

The presence of arc strikes on the surface, improper starting conditions, or accidental contact may be at the origin of considerable damage.

Hardness testing is a very informative, simple, nondestructive test. However, selecting the proper locations, especially if the weldment must be sectioned for testing, may be beyond what can be expected from a technician not specifically trained for this kind of investigation.

The materials involved should be known and their properties checked for conformance to specifications. No weld repair should be attempted without this essential knowledge. Having this information allows you to select the proper repair procedures and filler metal.

If materials are not known, an effort should be made to provide at least qualitative information. This information can be obtained by X-ray fluorescence, a nondestructive test readily available from many metal-related services.

What Next?

Having assembled and organized all the facts, you now should be able to formulate an educated guess as to the possible causes of the failure.

Was faulty workmanship the culprit? A professional investigation service uses metallographic examinations of weld sections to look for weld defects in the original weldment. Obviously, faulty welds should have been detected by inspection after manufacturing, but nobody is perfect. If the original weld was faulty, a repair weld performed with utmost care should improve the future in-service performance of the repaired item.

A design change is not normally applicable for repair. However, if it is clear a faulty design caused the failure, an improvement might be introduced. But you should be aware that adding stiffness may make the matter worse, by increasing internal stresses and paving the way for the next fatigue fracture.

If the breakdown was sudden but caused by a progressively deteriorating condition of certain components (as in the case of fatigue fractures or corrosion), a corrective action program should be initiated. The plan has to incorporate periodic examination of the parts involved, after the structure is repaired, to detect dangerously spreading cracks before much damage occurs again.

Cracks must be removed completely by careful grinding before rewelding. If the base metal is in acceptable condition, weld repair may be attempted with suitable ductile filler metal or low-hydrogen electrodes.

The process selected should introduce minimum heat and residual stresses, and possibly should be followed by light hammer peening. Preheat and/or postheat, if necessary.

If separation has occurred, then a proper joint has to be designed and prepared, possibly by introducing a transition element to make up for the volume of metal to be discarded.

Experience and common sense always are important, and even more so when dealing with weld repairs.

1Understanding How Components Fail by Donald J. Wulpi is available from Click on Bookstore, then on Failure Analysis, and then on Understanding How Components Fail.

Elia E. Levi is a welding consultant. He can be reached at,


Popular posts from this blog


  Buku ini adalah kumpulan kisah pengalaman seorang pekerja lapangan di bidang Migas Ditujukan untuk kawan-kawan para pekerja lapangan dan para sarjana teknik yang baru bertugas sebagai Insinyur Proses di lapangan. Pengantar Penulis Saya masih teringat ketika lulus dari jurusan Teknik Kimia dan langsung berhadapan dengan dunia nyata (pabrik minyak dan gas) dan tergagap-gagap dalam menghadapi problem di lapangan yang menuntut persyaratan dari seorang insinyur proses dalam memahami suatu permasalahan dengan cepat, dan terkadang butuh kecerdikan – yang sanggup menjembatani antara teori pendidikan tinggi dan dunia nyata (=dunia kerja). Semakin lama bekerja di front line operation – dalam hal troubleshooting – semakin memperkaya kita dalam memahami permasalahan-permasalahan proses berikutnya. Menurut hemat saya, masalah-masalah troubleshooting proses di lapangan seringkali adalah masalah yang sederhana, namun terkadang menjadi ruwet karena tidak tahu harus dari mana memulainya. Hal tersebut

[Lowongan Kerja] QA System Coordinator, Pipe Yard Coordinator, Customer Assistant Coordinator

With over 30 years' experience, Air Energi are the premier supplier of trusted expertise to the oil and gas industry. Headquartered in Manchester UK, Air Energi has regional hubs in Houston, Doha, Singapore and Brisbane. We have offices in 35 locations worldwide, experience of supply for 50 countries worldwide, and through our company values: Safe, knowledgeable, innovative, passionate, inclusive, and pragmatism, WE DELIVER, each and every time. At the moment we are supporting a multinational OCTG processing operation in seeking of below positions: 1.       QA System Coordinator Coordinates Quality System development in plant, directing the implementation of specifications and quality norms. Administers complaints regarding non-conformities and provides quality process information in support of decision making. Develops the necessary procedures, instructions and specifications to ensure Quality System conformity. Coordinates and organizes the execution of interna

API 6D atau API 598

Kalau berbicara standard: maka yang dipakai untuk inspeksi dan pengetesan VALVE adalah API STD 598 dan ANSI/ASME B16.34. Makanya jika kita nanti membuka perihal pengetesan (valve testing) di API STD 598, disana akan akan note bahwa besaran pressure test-nya mengacu ke ANSI/ASME B16.34. Perlu diketahui bahwa API 6D adalah specification for Pipeline Valve. Makanya disebut API SPEC 6D. API ini khusus menjelaskan spesifikasi untuk katup yang digunakan pada Pipeline. Tanya - Zachari Alamsyah Dear para miliser  migas sekalian..Bapak2 saudara-saudari sekalian Saya ingin menanyakan untuk pengetesan katup (Valve), seperti butterfly, globe, needle, ball, gate valve standar apa yang harus digunakan. setelah saya melakukan pencarian terdapat 2 standar yati API 6D (pipeline Valves) atau API 598 (Valves testing). Standar mana yang jadi acuan untuk pengetesan tersebut? Demikian pertanyaan saya. Terima Kasih Tanggapan - Sabar Simatupang Dear pak Alamsyah dan rekan-rekan Migas, Kalau